Effect of Parity and Birth Type on Udder Characteristics, Milk Yield and Composition of West African Dwarf Sheep.
ABSTRACT
Twelve West African Dwarf (WAD) sheep, four in each of parities one, two and three were used to determine effect of parity and birth type on udder characteristics during pregnancy and lactation, milk yield and composition and their phenotypic relationships with milk yield .
Udder length (UL), udder width (UW), udder circumference (UC), udder volume (UV), teat length (TL), teat width (TW), teat circumference (TC).
Distance between the teat (DBT) and teat height from the ground (THG) of sheep were measured monthly for the five months of pregnancy and weekly for the twelve weeks of lactation commencing from four days post partum.
Result showed that, parity effect on all udder characteristics during pregnancy and lactation was highly significant (P < 0.01).
During pregnancy ewes in parity three had highest values (cm) of 8.26, 8.08, 23.95, 1.12, 1.08, 2.49, 287.34, 6.25 and 27.20 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively, followed by ewes in parity two with values (cm) of 6.30, 7.32, 23.29, 1.05, 0.72, 2.18, 229.3, 5.73 and 23.69 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively.
Those in parity one had least values (cm) of 5.88, 6.33, 22.19, 1.02, 0.69, 2.14, 119.91, 5.35 and 22.02 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively.
During lactation, ewes in the third parity had significantly highest values (cm) of 9.08, 9.00, 39.10, 1.89, 1.24, 3.31, 400.36, 7.11 and 25.98 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively, followed by those in the second parity with 7.88, 8.66, 35.79, 1.57, 1.03, 2.53, 310.03, 6.56 and 24.95 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively.
Ewes in the first parity had significantly lowest values (cm) of 7.33, 8.35, 32.56, 1.28, 0.93, 2.41, 271.90, 6.28 and 25.98 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively. Birth type effect on udder characteristics during pregnancy and lactation was highly significant (P < 0.01).
Twin bearing ewes had significantly higher values (cm) of 6.88, 7.31, 23.71, 1.09, 0.85, 2.35, 227.68, 5.86 and 24.68 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively than those of single bearing ewes (6.74, 7.18, 22.58, 1.03, 0.80, 2.18, 196.64, 5.68 and 23.92 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively) during pregnancy.
During lactation, twin bearing ewes had significantly higher values (cm) of 8.35, 8.98, 37.25, 1.67, 1.13, 2.82, 364.25, 6.75 and 25.10 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively than single bearing ewes with values of 7.84, 8.36, 34.38, 1.49, 1.01, 2.69, 290.61, 6.55 and 24.65 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT and THG, respectively.
Ewes in the third parity had highest mean milk yield of 228.95 ml followed by ewes in second parity (157.18 ml), while ewes in the first parity had least milk yield of 126.42 ml. Twin bearing ewes in the third parity had highest mean milk yield of 249.09±14.85 ml during lactation. Single bearing ewes in the first parity had the smallest mean value of 124.54 ml.
Parity effect on milk composition was highly significant (P < 0.01) for moisture, total solid, solid not fat, protein, fat and ash but not significant (P > 0.05) for lactose. Ewes in the third parity had highest mean values (%) of 79.24, 20.73, 12.98, 6.58, 7.84, 0.77 and 5.53 for moisture, total solid, solid not fat, protein, fat, ash and lactose, respectively, followed by ewes in the second parity with 80.95, 18.84, 11.79, 6.04, 6.27, 0.76 and 4.98 for same constituents while ewes in the first parity had the corresponding values of 82.75, 17.25, 10.63, 5.48, 6.61, 2.75 and 3.37.
Birth type effect on milk composition was highly significant (P < 0.01) for all milk constituents except total solid and lactose. Twin bearing ewes had significantly higher mean values (%) of 80.86, 18.94, 11.85, 6.06, 7.29, 0.768 and 4.97 for moisture, total solid, solid not fat, protein, fat, ash and lactose respectively, than those of single bearing ewes with 81.08 %, 18.92 %, 11.75 %, 6.00 %, 7.18 %, 0.760 % and 4.96 % for corresponding constituents.
The correlation coefficients between udder dimensions and milk yield were; 0.92, 0.79, 0.91, 0.92, 0.86, 0.88, 0.60, 0.08 and -0.24 for UL, UW, UC, TL, TW, TC, UV, DBT, and THG respectively.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Content Page
Title page i
Declaration ii
Certification iii
Dedication iv
Acknowledgement v
Abstract vi
Table of content vii
List of tables ix
List of figure xii
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER TWO
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 The distribution and potential of sheep in the tropics 4
2.2 Advantages of West African Dwarf (WAD) sheep 5
2.3 Reproductive potentials of WAD sheep 6
2.4. Milk yield potentials of diary ewes 6
2.5 Nutrient requirement of pregnant and lactating ewes 9
2.6 Mammary gland development in ewes 12
2.7 Udder measurements and their importance 14
2.8 Lactation persistency 15
2.9 Unique nutritional values of sheep milk 17
2.10 Composition of sheep milk 17
2.11 Factors affect milk yield and composition of sheep 24
2.12 Animal factors 26
2.13 Environment 31
2.14 Management practices 33
2.15 The use of sheep milk 35
2.16 Conservation of fresh milk 37
2.17 Management of diary sheep 38
CHAPTER THREE
3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS 39
3.1 Experimental site 39
3.2 Experimental animals 39
3.3 Experimental design 39
3.4 Management of experimental animals 40
3.5 Data collection 42
3.6 Statistical analysis 44
CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 RESULTS 45
CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 DISCUSSION 72
5.1 Conclusion 77
5.2 Recommendation 79
REFERENCES 80
INTRODUCTION
The shortage of animal protein is a common problem facing many tropical countries including Nigeria (FAO, 2003).
It was reported by Akinfala et al. (2003), that the supply of animal protein for human consumption in Nigeria was below the demand.
Despite the numerous advantages associated with the consumption of animal protein, the minimum intake recommended by FAO (1992) has not been met in most developing countries.
Harold (1984) reported that meat was assumed to be the only product from cow when it was domesticated, whereas other dietary products from cattle included milk and its products.
Harold (1984) further reported that animal milk was first known to have been used as human food around 5000 B.C. and it was first used as human food in the Middle East.
Meanwhile, the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO, 2001) reported that the world milk production percentage from cow was 84.6 % while that of sheep was 1.3 %.
The composition of different kinds of milk as reported by George (2001) shows that the nutritional value of sheep milk with 19.30 % solids, 7 % fat, 5.98 % protein, 193 mg calcium, and 108 kcal is superior in quality to those of cow and goat with 12.01 % and12.97 % solids.
3.34 % and 4.14 % fat, 3.29 % and 3.56 % protein, 119 mg and 134 mg calcium and 69 kcal, respectively. There is therefore need to increase milk production from the sheep.
Adewumi and Olorunsomo (2009) pointed out that increasing demand for milk and its products in Nigeria has made it imperative to look for other sources of milk apart from cattle.
According to the authors, local milk production has consistently fallen short of demand over the years, especially in urban centres leading to massive importation of milk and milk products. Continuous dependence on imported milk has led to increase in cost of milk 2 thereby pushing these products beyond the reach of the average Nigerian. Hence, it is necessary to look for alternative sources of milk for local consumption.
Local sheep breeds in Nigeria have potentials to supply a significant portion of the milk deficit in the country because sheep numbers far exceed cattle numbers in both rural and urban communities (Rim, 1992; Adewumi, 2005).
They are also more affordable to resourcepoor families and produce more milk in relation to body size than cattle (Nuru, 1985). Sheep milk has been found to be richer in critical nutrients except lactose, than the milk of humans, cattle and goats (Buffano et al, 1996).
The high content of vitamin D and calcium in sheep milk helps in fighting against osteoporosis. It is very useful in the treatment of neurotic indigestion, insomnia, dyspepsia, peptic ulcer, pyloric stenosis and rheumatism.
REFERENCES
Abou-Dawood, A.E and Taha, S.M. 1980. Major and minor components and trace elements of the Egyptian ewes and goat milk. Egyptian Journal of Dairy Science 8:109-115.
Adebambo, O.A., Samuel, A.O and Onakade, A.D. 1994. Causes of variation in reproductive performance of West African Dwarf Goat. Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 22:29-36.
Ademosun, A.A.1994.Constraints and prospects for small ruminants research and developme nt in Africa. CTA publication series. Lebbie, S.H.B., Rey, B and Irungun E.K. (Eds). Book of proceedings. 2nd Biennial Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network, Tanzania. Page 266.
Adewumi, O. O. 2005. Sheep milk: The most important but neglected source of protein. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference of Animal Science Association of Nigeria, University of Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria. September 12-15, 2005, page 237-239.
Adewumi, O.O., Ologun, A.G and Alokan, J. A. 2001. Sensory evaluation and marketability of sheep milk in Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture, Forestry, and Fisheries.2:5-7.
Adewumi, O.O and Olorunnisomo, A.O. 2009. Milk yield and milk composition of West African Dwarf, Yankasa and crossbred sheep in Southwest of Nigeria. Livestock Research for Development. 21 (3): Page 1
Adu, I.F. and Ngere, L. O. 1979. The indigenous sheep of Nigeria. World Review Animal Production. 15(3):51-62.
Akinfala, E.O, O and Aderibigbe, A.O. 2003. Preliminary Studies on the Response of weaner rabbit to whole cassava plant meal basal diets in humid tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development. (15) 4: 17-25.
Akinsoyinu, A. O 1980. The composition of milk of Friesian cattle imported into Nigeria.
Journal of Science Food and Agriculture. 32: 861-867.
Akinyemi, M.O and Salako, A. E. 2010. Hemoglobin Polymorphism and Morphometrical Correlates in the West African Dwarf Sheep of Nigeria. International Journal of Morphology. 28(1):205-208.
Alfa-Laval.1981. System Solutions for Dairy Sheep. Alfa -Laval Agri International AB, Tumba, Sweden.
Be the first to comment