Board Characteristics, Ownership Structure and Firm Value of Listed Petroleum Firms in Nigeria

Board Characteristics, Ownership Structure and Firm Value of Listed Petroleum Firms in Nigeria.

ABSTRACT

This research work studied the relationship between board characteristics,ownership structure and the firm value of listedpetroleum firms in Nigeria.

From a population of fifteen firms, the study used six listed petroleum firms that had consistently published their annual audited financial reports from 2008 to 2015.

The data was analyzed using the robust pooled-OLS multiple regression technique in view of the absence of panel effect in the data as confirmed by the result of Breusch Pagan Lagrangian Multiplier test.

The results of the robust pooled-OLS regression analysis revealed that board independence, board size as well as managerial shareholding had a negative but significant relationship with firm value.

In the case of board gender diversity, it was discovered that the inclusion of females on the board of petroleum firms in Nigeria had a positive and significant relationship with firm value. While ownership concentration has an insignificant relationship on firm value.

In view of the findings, the study recommended an optimal board size of nine directors, beyond which an additional board member will create added costs greater than the benefit derivable from the added board member.

Also, not less than two females are recommended on the boards of listed petroleum firms in Nigeria to improve firm value.

In addition, concentrated shareholding should be encouraged at the level of 19%, but should not be above 74% of the firm‟s shareholding, while a large managerial ownership structure should be moderated to about 37% to reduce the abuse of shareholders resources.

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background of the Study

The sensitivity of Nigeria‟s petroleum industry is clearly reflected in its importance to the Nigerian economy, because as a major foreign exchange earnerit contributes over 80% of government revenues and also provides for the development of Nigeria‟s infrastructures and other industries (Anya, 2002; Chukwu, 2002; Mathiason, 2006).

According to the British Petroleum (BP) Statistical Energy Surveyas cited in Mbendi (2014), Nigeria is a leading oil and gas producer in Africa and is ranked as the tenth largest oil producer in the world with proved oil reserves of about 37.2 billion barrels, and estimates in excess of 187.5 trillion standard cubic feet of natural gas as at the end of 2011.

The foregoing underscores the vast investments potentials of the Nigerian petroleum industry; hence, investment decisions is likely to be influenced by the value of firms in the industry.

Given that the maximization of firm value depends upon the financial health of the firm, which involves the evaluation and selection of appropriate governance strategies and financial structures that can influence the firm‟s value. Thus, the aim of firm executives is to maximize the value of the firmand its stock (Namazi&Kirmani,2009).

REFERENCES

Brown, L. D. & Gorgens, T. (2009). Corporate governance and financial performance in an Australian context. Treasury Working Paper 2009 – 02. The Australian Treasury/Australian National University.

Burke, R. (2000). Company size, board size and the number of women corporate directors. Burke, R. & Mattis, M. (ed). Women on corporate boards of directors. Netherlands 157-167, Khiwer Academic Publishers.

Byrd, J. & Hickman, K. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of FinancialEconomics, 32(2), 195-221.

Campbell, K. &Minguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 435-451.

Campbell, K. & Mınguez-Vera, A. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management and Governance, 14, 37–59.

Capulong, V., Edwards, D., Webb, D. & Zhuang, J. (2000). Corporate governance and finance in East Asia: A study of Indonesia, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Philippines and Thailand.Asian Development Bank, (1), Manila.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*