Comparison between Calculated and Measured Entrance Skin Dose of Common Radiographic Procedures in Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi

Comparison between Calculated and Measured Entrance Skin Dose of Common Radiographic Procedures in Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi.

ABSTRACT

The Entrance Skin Dose (ESD) for common radiographic examinations of forty (40) patients was measured prospectively at the Benue State University Teaching Hospital, Makurdi using lif thermo-luminescent dosimeter (TLD) chips.

The examination comprised ten  (10) the patient’s each of the chest, abdomen, pelvic, and lumbar-sacral regions. The mean esds obtained by lif TLD for Chest  X-ray (PA),  Plain Abdomen, Lumbar Spine (AP) and  Pelvic (AP) were 0.50 mgy, 0.20 mgy, 0.80 mgy, 0.70 mgy respectively.

The mean esds determined by mathematical formulae of Edwin and mccoullough (1970), Edmonds (1984), Arun Kumar  et al. (1991), Chougule and Hussain (1993) and Pratik Kumar et al. (1996) for Chest X-ray were 0.50 mgy, 0.80 mgy, 0.30 mgy, 0.30 mgy and 0.60 respectively.

The mean esds for Plain Abdomen byedwin and mccoullough (1970), Edmonds (1984), Arun Kumar et al. (1991), Chougule and  Hussain (1993)  and  Pratik Kumar  et  al.  (1996)  were  found  to  be 3.00 mgy,5.00 mgy, 2.00 mgy, 1.70 mgy, 4.00  mgy respectively.

The mean esds for Lumbar Sacral by Edwin and mccoullough (1970), Edmonds (1984), Arun Kumar et al. (1991),  Chougule  and Hussain (1993) and Pratik Kumar et al. (1996) were 8.00 mgy, 11 mgy, 5.00 mgy, 4.00 mgy, 8.00 mgy respectively and the mean esds for Pelvic X-ray (AP) by Edwin and mccoullough (1970), Edmonds (1984), Arun

INTRODUCTION

Life on earth has developed with ever-present background radiation. It is not a new thing invented by the wit of man; radiation has always been there (Hall, 2012). Radiation is a  fact of life. It is all around us all the time, hence, we live in a naturally radioactive world.

Radiation could be defined as the energy that travels through space or matter in form of electromagnetic waves or photons or streams of radioactive particles (IAEA, 2005;  Bushberg  et al., 2002). Radiation can either be non-ionizing or ionizing, depending on  its ability to  ionize matter.

Non-ionizing radiation does not produce ionization or ions in the medium through which it passes. It has enough energy to move atoms in a molecule around or cause them to vibrate, but not enough to remove them. Examples of non-ionizing radiation include visible ray, infrared rays among others.

Ionizing radiation is a kind of radiation that is capable  of transferring energy to the atoms of the material which it interacts with, changing their physical state and leaving them electrically charged or ionized. Ionizing radiation  is categorized by the nature of the particles or electromagnetic waves creating  the  ionizing  effect.

Ionizing radiation has different ionization mechanisms, and  may  be  grouped  as directly or indirectly ionizing. Directly ionizing are those that carry a charge  and  can, therefore, interact directly with atomic electrons through coulomb forces (IAEA, 2005; Bushberg et al., 2002).

REFERENCES

Abdullah, M.H.R.O, Kandaiya, S., Lim, T.H. and  Chumiran,  S.H (2010): Preliminary Study  of the trend of patient dose arising from diagnostic X-ray examinations in Penang, malaysia. Journal of Applied Sciences and Researches.6 (12): 2257-2263.

Ademola,         A.K.,     Obed,  R.I.,      Adejumobi,      C.A.,     Abidunrin,       O.P.,    Alabi,   O.F., Oladapo,M.(2013): Assessment of Entrance Skin Dose in routine X-ray Examinations  of Chest, Skull, Abdomen and Pelvic of Children in five selected Hospital in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Applied Sciences: 5(2) Pp 47-50.

Ajayi, I.R and A. Akinwumiju(2000): Measurement of Entrance  Skin Doses  to  patients  in four Common Diagnostic Examinations by  Thermo-luminescence  Dosimter  in Nigeria. Radiation protection Dosim, 87:217-20.

Arun Kumar, L.S., Rehani, M.M. and Berry, M. (1991): Computer  Program  for  Revaluation of Patient Exposure in Routine Radiography. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 29 (Suppl.)

Axelsson, B., Boden, K., Fransson, S.G., Hansson,I.B., Persliden, J. And Witt, H.H. (2000): A and Comparison of Analogue and Digital  Techniques  in  Gastrointestinal Examinations: Absorbed Dose Diagnostic Quality of Images. Eur Radiol 10: 1351- 1354.

Anderson, M.E. (1997): Chronic Low Level Exposure Eg Cancer: Environ. Health Perspect.144(1):135-144. 

StudentsandScholarship Team. 

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*