The United Nations Security Council and International Conflict Resolution

The United Nations Security Council and International Conflict Resolution.

Table of Contents

ABSTRACT

This research effort grew out of concern for the increasing use of force in settlement of disputes by the United States which has the tendency to reduce the moral stature of the UN (above all, the security council) an organization committed to the maintenance of international peace and security.

It seeks to analyse the role of the United Nations security council in international conflict resolution, using the UN Weapons inspection in Iraq as a case study. This research work sets itself to determining whether the Weapons Inpectors did indict Iraq of possessing WMD.

The central focus of the study is to determine whether the UN Security Council authorized the war or whether the war was a pre-emptive action on the part of the U.S. and its allies. On the above premise, the theoretical framework of political Realism which holds that the overriding national interest of each State is its national Security and survival defined in terms of power.

However, the study revealed that the U.S. invasion of Iraq was a clear-cut case of aggression and territorial annexation of another country and therefore a violation of State Sovereignty. The findings of this research are that the United Nations Security Council which is the only organ that can authorize war in modern International law did not authorize the war on Iraq.

Consequently, in a bid to justify the war, the U.S and U.K anchored their action on UN Resolution 1441 which, however, never gave Member States an explicit permission to attack Iraq.

The study also revealed that the U.S. led war on Iraq was pre-emptive. Most importantly, the work revealed that the war has a significant relationship with the U.S. foreign policy on the Gulf region. Based on these findings; the study concludes that for peaceful co-existence among Nations, all States should uphold the integrity and authority of the United Nations and of International Law.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title page .. … … .. … … … … … … i
Approval page .. … … .. … … … … … … ii
Dedication .. … … .. … … … … … … .. iii
Acknowledgments.. … … .. … … … … … … iv
Abstract.. … … .. … … … … … … v
Table of contents.. … … .. … … … … … … vi

CHAPTER ONE Introduction

1.1 Background of the study .. … … .. … … … … 1
1.2 Statement of problem .. … … .. … … 2
1.3 Objectives of the study ….. … .. … … … … … 4
1.4 Significance of the study .. … … .. … … 4
1.5 Literature review .. … … .. … … … … … 5
1.6 Theoretical frame work .. … … .. … … … … 35
1.7 Hypotheses.. … … .. … … … … … … 37
1.8 Method of data collection .. … … .. … … … … 37
1.9 Method of data analysis .. … … .. … … … … 38
1.10 Research design .. … … .. … … … … … 39

CHAPTER TWO

2.1 UN Security Council Support for the Invasion of Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction…. 44
2.2 The United Nation Security Council and Inspection of Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq.50
2.3 U.S, The Middle-Mast and Weapons of Mass Destruction .. … … 53

CHAPTER THREE

3.1 United Nation Security Council Sanctions and Iraqi quest for Weapons of Mass Destruction. 72
3.2 The UN Security Council’s Sanctions Saga On Iraq … … … … 77
3.3 Sanctions and the Destruction of Weapons in Iraq.. … … .. .. .83

CHAPTER FOUR

4.1 IAEA, UN and Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction.. … … .. … 87
4.2 IAEA and Nuclear inspections in Iraq… … .. … … … 98

CHAPTER FIVE SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.1 Summary … … .. … … … .. … … … 103
5.2 Conclusion … … .. … … … .. … … … 110
5.3 Recommendations… … .. … … … .. … … 112
Bibliography

INTRODUCTION

The United Nations Organization was formed in 1945; it was to be a universal single-purpose organization that would promote world peace and security.

In order to ensure prompt and effective action by the United Nations, its Members confer on the Security Council the primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security and agree that in carrying out its duties under this responsibility the Security Council acts on their behalf.

The United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is the organ of the United Nations charged with maintaining international peace and security among nations.

While other organs of UN only make recommendations to member governments, the Security Council has the power to make decisions which member governments must carry out under Article 25 of the United Nations Charter, which reads “the members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the Security Council in accordance with the president charter.

The decisions of the Council are known as UNSC Resolutions. The Council is made up of 15 Member States, consisting of five permanent seats and ten temporary seats.

The five permanent seats are China, France, Russia, The United Kingdom and the United States. These big five hold veto power over substantive but not procedural resolutions. The ten temporary seats voted in by the UN General Assembly on a regional basis.

The presidency of the Security Council is rotated alphabetically each month. The Security Council performs these functions on the basis of a universal phenomenon that has come to be known as collective security.

This is a system in which aggression against a state is taken to be aggression against all that are parties to the treaty; consequently, collective action is to be taken by other states to counter such an aggression.

A good example was in 1991, when the United States led a coalition force of about 23 countries in a battle code-named “Operation Desert Storm” on Iraq for the former’s invasion and annexation of Kuwait on August 2, 1990.

BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Ahmed, A. (2009) The Right to Asylum between Islamic Shari’ah and International RefugeeLaw: A Comparative Study. United Nations High Commission for Refugee.

Altheide, D.L. (1987) Ethnographic Content Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Anjali V. P. (2002) The UN Veto in World Affairs, 1946-1990, Presented by Britain Anthony L. (2002) Bush and Iraq; New York Review of Books,

Anthony L. (2002) Bush and Iraq; the New York Review of Books. Arthur S. (2003) Eyeless in Gaza: New York Review of Books,

Asika, N. (1991) Researched Methodology in the Behavioural Science, Lagos: Longman Nigeria Plc.

Babbie, E. (2007) Social Research. 11th Edition. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

Bailey, K.D. (1978) Methods of Social Research. New York: Free press. Principles of Public International

Biereenu-Nnabugwu, M. (2006) Methodology of Political Inquiry: Issues and Techniques of Research Methods in Political Science. Enugu: Quintagon Publishers.

Bob W. (2003) Bush at war, New York Simon and Schuster.

Brownlie, I. (1980) Principles of Public International Law.4th Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Carrell , S. (2002) fresh wave of anger spread world Wide, independent UK.

Cohen, L. and Manion, L. (1980) Research Methods in Education. London: Croom Helm. Damrosh L. (2001) International Law: Cases and Materials.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*