THE METHODS AND PROCEDURES ADOPTED IN THIS RESEARCH WORK ON THE EFFECT OF INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT ON EMPLOYEE’S MORALE IN GUINNESS NIGERIAN BREWERIES PLC IKEJA LAGOS


 METHODOLOGY

3.1       Introduction

            This chapter is an account of the methods and procedures adopted in this research work on the effect of industrial accident on employee’s morale in Guinness Nigerian Breweries PLC Ikeja Lagos. Specifically, this chapter explains the rationale for the design adopted, the population and sample of the study, source of as well as the instruments and techniques for data collection and analysis.

3.2       Design Method

            In the research design the descriptive method of analysis is adopted. This entails the description of phenomenon and characteristics associated with the subject population,. In the words of Eboh (1998) descriptive studies can be carried out on small and large scale, they involve a systematic collection and presentation of data with hope that good picture of a particular situational will emerge.

  3.3                         Area of the study

The study covers only Guinness Nigerian Breweries PLC, Ikeja Lagos

3.4       Population characteristics

            The population size for the study comprised of both management staff and employees (skill and unskilled) of Guinness Nigerian Breweries PLC, Ikeja, Lagos.

            This is because almost everybody is prone to accident in an industrial setting. Because of the nature of work in the company it was difficult to get accurate number of employees working in the organization. Here, the population was estimated to be 600.

3.5         Sample size

 The sample size was determined using the Yaro Yamene formular, this is because the sample size cannot be guessed

n          =          N         (e)2

                        1 + N

When n          =          sample size

            N         =          population size

            e          =          level of significance

            I           =          constant

Subsisting for the above formula, we have

  600                 (0.05)2

          1  +  600

=             600    

            1  +  600         (0.0025)

=              600  

            1 + 1.5

=          350

            2.5

            11        =          240

3.6       Research Instrumentation

            A self-completion questionnaire was used for the purpose of obtaining data from the respondents. The questionnaire was grouped into two. The first one bordered on the issue of demographic characteristics of the company such as Age, sex and academic qualifications while the second one concentrated on obtaining data pertaining to the issue of accident and moral.

3.7       Validity and Reliability of Research instruments.

            The questionnaire was subjected to initial tests for validity and consistency before it was finally adopted. According to Ukwuije (2003) validity is the extent which an instrument measures what it is expected to measure, while reliability measures on the other hand test the consistency of the instrument.

            The questionnaire which was constructed to achieve the above aims was tested by the expert in this field before going out to the respondents.

3.8       Sources of Data

            Data for this research were both qualitative and quantitative, while qualitative data were obtained form interviews and comments of key informants” quantitative data were got from studies whose findings are mainly products of statistical surveys, summaries and analysis.

            Both the qualitative and quantitative data for the study were obtained form two sources, ie primary and secondary sources. Primary sources p
rovides data in their raw and unused forms, with the questionnaire and interview serving as the major instruments and technique of data collection.

            Secondary sources of data for this study were textbooks handbooks, journals, magazines, dictionaries and internet websites that were considered reliant to the study.

3.9       Analytical methods and techniques

 Here, the descriptive mode of analysis is made use of. Responses of the respondents are presented in matrix tables with a calculation of their corresponding

Frequencies

Percentages

Mean

.   10      Decision Rule

            Adopting the chi-square formula as developed by Kal Pearson, Pertorious, (1995). The decision rule for the testing of hypothesis is

Reject Ho, if calculated X2 >critical value

Accept Ho, if calculated X2 >critical value.

Reject Hi, if calculated X2 < critical value.

Accept Hi if calculated X2 < critical value.

CHAPTER FOUR

                     DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1       INTRODUCTION

            Relevant data collected for this study were recorded, edited and coded, and were presented as follows;

A                     =          Agreed

SA                   =          Strongly Agreed

D                     =          Disagreed

SD                   =          Strongly Disagreed

TPR                 =          Total positive Response

TNR                =          Total negative Response

TR                   =          Total Response

%TPR =          Percentage of total positive response

%TNR            =          Percentage of total negative response

Table 4.1

Distribution
Distribution as to the effect of industrial accident on employee’s morale

A

SA

D

SD

TPR

TNR

TR

%TPR

%TNR

Question 11

37

65

41

29

102

70

172

42

29

Question 9

42

69

53

34

111

87

198

46

36

Question 11

38

51

37

42

89

79

168

37

33

Total

117

185

131

105

302

236

538

125

98

Source:  Fieldwork

Table 4.1        above shows that total of 302 respondents or 125% agreed that industrial accident has effect on employee’s morale whereas total of 236 respondents or 98% from various questionnaires disagreed that industrial accident has effect on employee’s morale.

Table 4.2

Distributions as to the extent of which training reduces industrial accident rate.

A

SA

D

SD

TPR

TNR

TR

%TPR

%TNR

Question 12

92

65

13

27

157

157


40

65

17

Question 14

68

57

25

27

125

52

52

52

22

Total

160

122

38

54

282

92

374

117

39

Source: Field work

            From the table above, a total position response of 282, representing 117% agreed with the fact that training reduces industrial accident rate whereas a total of 92 respondents representing 39% disagreed.

Table 4.3

A

SA

D

SD

TPR

TNR

TR

%TPR

%TNR

Question 18

41

29

65

37

70

102

172

29

42

Question 19

37

42

38

51

79

89

168

37

33

Total

78

71

103

88

149

191

340

66

75

Distribution as to control measures to reduce industrial accident in the company.

Source:          Fieldwork

            The table above shows that a total of 149 or 66% respondents agreed that  Guinness Nigreian breweries, PLC Ikeja Lagos, have control measures to reduce industrial accident in the company while a total of 191 respondents or 75% disagreed that the company have control measures.

Table 4.4

Distribution as to the cost effect of industrial accident in the company.

A

SA

D

SD

TPR

TNR

TR

%TPR

%TNR

Question 8

62

57

35

41

119

76

195

50

32

Question 10

57

65

42

37

172

79

201

72

33

Question 13

48

45

42

43

93

85

178

39

35

Question 20

37

42

38

51

79

89

168

33

37

Total

204

209

157

172

463

329

792

194

137

Source:          Fieldwork

Table 4.4 shows that 463 respondents or 194% shows that there are cost effect of industrial accident whereas 329 respondents representing 137% disagreed that there are cost effect of industrial accident in Guinness Nigerian breweries PLC, Ikeja Lagos.

4.2       Test of hypotheses

            In view of the available and relevant data for this study provided by the fieldwork, the researcher decided to test both hypotheses in section 1.

Re-statement of Hypothesis 1

Null Hypothesis (H0):

            Industrial accident has no effects on employee morale.

Null Hypothesis (H2):

            Industrial accident has effects on employee morale.

Decision Rule:

Reject H0, if calculated X2 > critical value

Accept H0, if calculated X2 < critical value

Reject H1, if calculated X2 < critical value

Accept H1, if calculated X2 > critical value

Degree of freedom   =          (R – 1)            (c-1)

                                                            (4-1)               (3-1)

 3 x 2  =          6df

Critical value of 6df at 5% significance level 12.59.

Table 4.5

Value Utilized In Testing Hypothesis

A

SA

D

SD

Total

Percentage

Q4

37

59

42

34

172

Q9

43

68

48

39

198

Q11

37

58

41

33

168

Total

117

185

131

105

538

Calculation of the expected frequencies from the observed frequencies

37 = 172 x117 = 37

               538

42 = 198 x117 = 43

   538

38 = 168 x 117 = 37

                538

65 = 172 x185 = 59

                538

69 = 198 x 185 = 68

                 538

51 = 168 x 185 = 58

    538

41 = 172 x 131 =42

                538

53 = 198 x 131 = 48

               538

37 = 168 x 131 = 41

                538

29 = 172 x 105 =34

                538

34 = 198 x 105 = 39

                538

42 = 168 x 105 = 33

               538

Table 4.6

Obs. Freq.

Exp. Freq

(O-e

(O-e)2

(O-e)2/e

37

37

0

0

0

42

43

-1

1

0.025

38

37

1

1

0.027

65

59

6

36

0.610

69

68

1

1

0.0147

51

58

7

49

0.844

41

42

-1

1

0.0238

53

48

5

25

0.520

37

41

-4

16

0.390

29

34

-5

25

0.735

34

39

-5

25

0.641

42

33

9

81

2.5

538

59

-1

198

6.33

 Observed frequency expected frequency

  Ex 2 = 6.33

x 2  =å (O-e) 2  = 6.33

                  e

Calculated x 2  = 6.33

Critical value = 2.4469

Since the calculated x 2 (6.33) is greater than the critical value x 2 (24469), the null hypothesis is rejected

4.2 Test of hypothesis II

A

SA

D

SD

Total

Percent

Q48

54

55

41

45

195

Qus 10

55

57

43

47

201

Q13

49

50

38

42

178

Q20

46

47

36

39

168

204

209

157

172

742

62 = 195 x 204 = 54

               742

57 = 201 x 204 = 55

               742

48 = 178 x 204 = 49

             742

37 = 168 x 204 = 46

                742

57 = 195 x 209 = 55

              742

65 = 201 x 209 = 57

               742

45 = 178 x 209 = 50

               742

42 = 168 x 209 = 47

               742

35 = 195 x 157 = 41

                742

42 = 201 x 157 = 43

                742

42 = 178 x 157 = 38

                742

38 = 168 x 157 = 36

    742

41 = 195 x172 = 45

                742

37 = 201 x 172 = -47

                742

43 = 178 x 173 = 42

               742

51 = 168 x 172 = 39

                742

 

Obse.freq

Expect freq (e)

O-e

(O-e)2

(O-e) 2/e

62

54

8

64

1.18

57

55

-2

4

0.072

48

49

-1

1

0.020

37

46

-9

81

1.8

57

55

2

4

0.072

65

51

8

64

1.12

45

50

5

25

0.5

42

47

-5

25

0.53

35

41

-6

36

0.878

42

43

-1

1

0.023

42

38

4

16

0.421

38

36

2

4

0.111

41

45

-4

16

0.355

37

47

-10

100

2.12

43

42

1

1

0.02

51

39

12

144

3.69

742

744

4

566

12.912

Ex2 = 12.912

X2 = å(o-e) 2 = 12.912

                E

Calculated x2 = 12.912

Critical value = 1.8331

Decision Rule:

            Since the calculated x2 (12.912) is greater than the critical value x2 (1.8331),

Table 4.9

Values utilized for the test of hypothesis II
I

A

SA

D

SD

Total

Q12

87

64

20

194

Q14

76

58

18

177

Total

160

122

38

51

371

92 = 194 x 160 = 87

             371

68 = 160 x 177 = 76

                371

65 = 194 x 122 = 64

               371

57 = 177 x 122 = 58

                371

13 = 197 x 38 = 20

              371

25 = 177 x 38 = 18

                371

24 = 197 x 51 = 27

               371

27 = 177 x 51 = 24

 371

 

Obs. Freq O

Exp. Freq (e)

0-e

(o-e)2

(o-e)2/e

92

87

5

25

0.3

68

76

-8

64

0.84

65

64

1

1

0.015

57

58

-1

1

0.017

13

20

-7

49

2.45

25

18

7

49

2.8

24

27

-3

9

0.33

27

24

3

9

0.12

371

374

-3

207

6.872

Ex 2 = 6.9

X  2 = å( o – e ) 2 = 6.9

                  e

Calculated value x  2 = 6.9

Critical value = 2, 3534

Decision Rule

            Since the calculated x 2 (6.9) is greater than the critical value x 2 (2.3534) the null hypothesis is accepted. We there fore conclude that “Employee’s training has significant impact in controlling accident in the organization..

Discussions

5.1       Discussion of Findings

            From the above findings, the researcher discovered that industrial accident is unavoidable in any industrial establishment, from the result of the questionnaires distributed among staff or Employees of Guinness Nigerian Breweries, plc Ikeja Lagos, it was discovered that no matter the level of prevention of industrial accidents, we cannot stop its occurrence. From the first hypothesis tested, the result shows that industrial accident has significant effect on employee’s morale. The second hypothesis put it that though industrial accident is unavoidable, the cost of  reduce the accident has a significant effect on the organization performance. Finally, the third hypothesis concludes that, Employees training has significant impact on controlling accident in the organization. This implies that expatriates are needed if industrial accidents are to be minimized in any industry. 

5.2       Implications of Review

 A major service sector that will improve the employee morale is the inclusion of global diversity plan to help communicate, among others, all the departments in the industry. This will help in the reduction of accidents as well as improve in the employee services delivery.

            Equally, from the literature, it was reviewed that distrust among top-workers and their level of relationship to their junior cadre affects the employee’s morale. To this end both sector should endeavor to come together to rescue the problems. The implication is that the industrial  management should endeavour to improve in managing their industrial hazard  for greater efficiency.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*